Diddy’s Lawyers Liken Him To An ‘Amateur Porn Producer’

0
17588990797519-e1758899133169.jpg


The legal team for Sean “Diddy” Kammen Just pulled a … interesting … labor … argument in advance of its convaction of his convict.

Concert for Diana
Source: Justin Goff Photos / Getty

On Thursday, the age of September, Kammen, Alexandra Shapiro, appeared in Manhattan Federal Court to challenge the conviction of the bad boy. According to USA Todaythey are pleaded with Judge Arun Subramanian To urge the bury to urjury around the jury, insist all people involved in Diddy's Sexcapades prepared great participants.

This comes over two months after a jury is delivered a split Verdaced Mogul to Prostitution to do to prostitution, including three counts of racketeering and sex-trading costs.

The New York-based jury determined that combs of the escorts have paid to cross stripe lines to participate in sexual activity with his ex-girlfriends. Two of that girlfriends testified that Diddy was with her violent and threatened to cut their financially when they did not have his bids.

In a movement equal to what they influenced in the entire trial, shrinks Diddy wraps in days-long sexarathons and said the government should not criminalize between adults.

“What we are left, is a matter of adults traveling Interstate and participated in a trio,” Shapiro argument, per USA Today.

Sean Combs
Source: Getty / General

As a response, Meredith Foster Foster Fools that or Not Didded in the Gender Considerable, because he settled the Escorts' travel accommodations and his former assured. Process Christy Slavik said the women “experienced” secondary effects “of prostitution, despite the behavior that happens to be closed doors.

“Mrs. Ventura was punch in the face. Jane was hit and kicked,” Slav Slavs the judge. “The defendant provided drugs to all parties.”

The defense is also claimed Diddy's Conviction must be reversed because combs a lot of the “freak-offs movies movies.”

“He was a consumer of Amateur Porn,” Shamiro said, according to ABC News. “Adults have the right to consume pornography.”

Slavik argument return, “it is just not the case that the defendant is producing an amateur porno. The record does not support a inference of making pornography.”

During this unconventional argument comparison came to a porn producer, members of his family – including his mother and children sat in the gallery.

After hearing both sides, Subamanian said, he would issue a decision “very soon.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *