Brigitte Macron plans to submit photographic evidence to the American court to prove that she is a woman in a defamation trial against Candace Owens

The first lady of France Brigitte Macron would submit photographic and scientific evidence to the American court to prove that she is a woman as part of her defamation trial against the right -wing influencer Candace Owens.

For those who are not informed, French president Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, continued Owens for defamation in Delaware in July 2025 after the right commentator said on several occasions that Brigitte Macron was born and went to a woman in thirties.

In a recent interview on the BBC Fame under fire The podcast, Tom Clare, the Macron lawyer, revealed that the president and his wife were ready to provide evidence to refute the allegations of Owens “both generic and specifically”.

In addition, he referred to the provision of photographic evidence of pregnant pregnancy if necessary to continue their trial, adding that “a testimony of experts who will be out of scientific nature”. He continued that Brigitte Macron was “100% ready to answer this burden” to “set a record on time”, saying:

“It is a process that she [Brigitte] will have to submit in a very public way. But she is ready to do so. It is firmly resolved to do what it takes to set the record straight. If this inconvenience and this discomfort she has to open this way is what it takes to put a record and stop this, it is 100% ready to respond to this burden. “”

Speaking on the podcast, Tom Clare said that Owens' allegations were “incredibly overwhelming” and distracting for the French president, adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding: adding:

“I do not want to suggest that this has somehow threw him from his game. But as anyone juggling with a career and a family life too, when your family is attacked, that carries you. And he is not immune to that because he is the president of a country.”

Explore the defamation trial of Brigitte Macron against Candace Owens

The defamation trial of macrons against Candace Owens came after the right influencer pretended several times that Brigitte Macron was born under the name Jean-Michel Trognin.

The conspiracy theory first gained popularity through two French bloggers, Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey, on their Youtube video 2021. The Macrons filed a defamation complaint against the two women in 2022 before a French court and won the case in 2024. However, the two women appealed and were acquitted in July 2025 for reasons of freedom of expression.

Meanwhile, Owens brought the theory to the consumer media in the United States via its content on social networks. In March 2024, the right influencer said that she “would put all her professional reputation” on the theory that Brigitte Macron was born.

According to CNN, she published a YouTube video entitled Is the first lady of France a man? In March 2025, the appellant “probably the greatest scandal in political history” in a later post X. It was the first of many videos that Owens published on Brigitte Macron. She also downloaded a series of multipars entitled Become brigitte.

In July 2025, macrons brought a defamation action against Candace Owens In Delaware, the United States, accusing the conservative commentator of claiming “bizarre, defamatory and eccentric fictions” online on the first lady of France.

According to ABC News, The trial said Owens used the story “to promote his independent platform, earn notoriety and earn money”. In addition, the file said that Owens' account would have opened the doors to macrons to face “incessant intimidation on a global scale”, adding that allegations “have subjected macrons to a global humiliation campaign, transforming their lives into heaviness for lies induced by profit”.

“These statements are clearly false, and Owens knew they were false when she published them. However, she still published them. And reason is clear: it is not the continuation of the truth, but the pursuit of glory,” said the deposit.

He continued:

“The result is an implacable intimidation on a global scale. Whenever macrons leave their house, they do it knowing that countless people have heard, and many believe, these vile manufacturing. It is invasive, dehumanizing and deeply unfair.”

Meanwhile, an Owens spokesman said the commentator believed that the trial concerned a “foreign government attacking the rights of the first amendment to an American independent journalist”, accusing the macrons of having tried “to intimidate a journalist for submission”.

“Candace has repeatedly asked for an interview with Brigitte Macron. Instead of offering a comment, Brigitte uses the test of intimidating a journalist in submission. In France, politicians can intimidate journalists, but it is not France. It is America,” added the declaration.

Candace Owens and his lawyers filed a request to reject the defamation trial. The case is underway when writing this article.