Drake Loses Universal Music Group Defamation Suit
Welp! After months of legal back-and-out, Universal music group has gone out victory in Drake's lemamation litigation.
De Hollywood reporter Reports that US District Judical Aannette Vargas ruled Thursday that the lyrics of Kendrick Lamar's “not fun us“Are expressions of opinion rather than statements of fact.
“A reasonable listener could not conclude that 'not like us' to transfer objective facts about Drake,' regarded them.
So before reportedComplaint that grew the legal battle of papi to encompass more than claimed umg.
Most recent, his team required internal documents Tied to considers domestic violence against lamar and try the nature of Dave Free's relationship with the children of Lamar.
In these fillings, the lawyers of Drake's lawyers, all documents and communications … related domestic violence accusations … committed by Kendrick Lamar. ” She also asked materials to “David Isaac Friley (A / K / A Dave Free) and his relationship with Kendrick Lamar and Kendrick Lamar.”
The requests Mirrored Lyrics of Lamar's The heart part 6In which Drake floating suggestions that one of the Lamar is not biologically, but instead of Dave Born FREE.
Drake blamed ERG of Orchestration of a “Financial conspiracy” by promoting the Music of the Lamar at the third parties to make the value of Drake to suppress DRAKE DURING DURED DURED DURED DURED DURED DURED DURING DURED DURED DURING DRAKE DURED DURED DURED DURING DRAKE DURED DURED DURED DURED DURED DURED DURING DRAKE DURED DURING DRAKE DURED DURED DURING DURING DURED DURED DURING DRAKE DURED DURED DURING DRAKING DURED DURED DURING DRAKE DURED DURED DURED DURING DURING DURING DURING DURED DURED DURING DRAKE DURED DURING DRAKE. His team demanded EXG products also produced versions of Lamar's Record CONTRACT (claiming that it is unfair censored), and documentation involving pre-labeling (Citing Pusha T's “Story of Adidon”) as president.
But in their ruling declined right Vargas to handle quick-battle deficiency or tained statements of fact.
De Hollywood reporter Comments that stress Vargas that tissier by nature-tracks hyperbolic, provoking language:
“The average listener is not impressed that a tissight is the product of a thought or not interested if not interested,” she wrote them. She added that the “rhetoric style, show, and context, full of progress and rhetoric flours, mark clearly or expressively rather than actual assertion.”
Broop!
Drake submitted its ladybak in January
So before reported, Drake in the years in the 19ths submitted against UMG in counter-year 2025, accuse the music guides to destroy himself. His complaint central to Kendrick Lamar's hit Diss Tiss, “not as us,” who referred to drake as a “children Predator.” Drake all that UMG does not spread this song only, but also promoted by “illegal resources.”
Umg, for his partially refused the claims, claim that the idea they would “try to evil the reputation of all artist-leaving only drake-is ilogolog.”
“Plaintiff, one of the most successful recording artists, lost that he provoked and in which he willingly joined,” The lawyers wrote in a submission for an appointment. “To accept” instead of the loss like the Unbothere Rap artists that he is often he sustained his own record-label in an incorrect attempt to save his wounds. “
The Laster suit came to Drake all in November 2024 That umg and spotify deployed and blow “success of the success of the success of the success” from Kendrick Lamar's “not like us,” violation the rico operation.
What do you think about losing DRAKE HIS UMG LEFAMATION PAKE?
